Shooting at YouTube HQ

0
727 views

A pure case of definitely not thinking…. Let’s dive into this can of worms…

Stupid? You two are the stupid ones… You are supposed to be “reporters “do some investigation, that’s what reporters do.

And speaking of stupid…

It’s you who can’t seem to comprehend English….

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,”
Means, you dolt… The state is allowed to have a militia… I.E. National Guard.

“The National Guard is made up of Citizen-Soldiers who train part time, close to home, until needed. Since 1636, each state has had its own militia. These became the foundation of today’s Guard units (this was mandated by the Constitution in 1787). The Guard mobilizes to protect U.S. domestic interests in times of conflict or natural disaster and may be deployed internationally alongside full-time troops when the situation demands.”

“the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Everyone else, in case the government goes off the rails, to protect yourself and your property.

And yes a good guy can stop a shooting….
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/08/texas-church-shooting-not-first-time-good-guy-with-gun-takes-down-mass-shooter.html

Problem is… the mass shooters hit the places that are “Gun / Weapon Free” zones. So if they don’t have a gun or a weapon, how can they stop them?

She, the YouTube shooter obviously had mental issues… you two retards…

And I’m surprised it hasn’t happened sooner, Google and YouTube with their “do as I say, not as I do” policies… It has pissed a lot of people off. And if you have spent any time on YouTube, there are a lot of people who are on the fence of snapping if you ask me. Like you for example… (Alex Jones, Keith Olbermann comes to mind too.) Is it really necessary to scream your point across or act retarded?

Take away guns… Hmm…

First, let me cite JUST 2 examples (and BTW there are more… ) of governments taking guns away from the people…
Germany under Hitler.
Russia under Stalin.
And you two clowns have compared Trump to Hitler… Hmm… So which is it? Which side are you two geniuses on?

Secondly, “your name sake” over threw the government and killed 1.3 million Armenians, who by the way… the vast majority of them were unarmed by the government.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Turks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide

Controlling / banning guns won’t solve any problems…

The real problem is Deinstitutionalization…

We allow mentally ill people to live among us instead of being under supervision and having no access to weapons. And states make it harder to put people in mental hospitals, they rather have them go to a counselor and rely on the mentally ill person to self medicate. In the hospital, they don’t allow you to self medicate, they make sure you are on your medications. The government decided it would be cheaper to throw them out of the mental institutions and have them live among us…

And by the way… all of the mass shootings except for one… happened after 1965 when President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Social Security Amendments of 1965. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States
Interesting fact… that apparently NO ONE can say there is a correlation between the two.
But I digress… I guess I’m stupid…

Read for yourself…
https://www.thebalance.com/deinstitutionalization-3306067
http://www.nytimes.com/1984/10/30/science/how-release-of-mental-patients-began.html?pagewanted=all
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/04/timeline-mental-health-america/
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/asylums/special/excerpt.html

Why this isn’t coming up as the real problem and they want to control guns instead?

Here are the answers…
The Enemies Within | Exposing Enemies within U.S. Congress
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01MQ3Y2DR/ref=cm_sw_su_dp

These next two movies are a little too religious for me, but still makes excellent points…
Agenda – Grinding America Down
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYzHl7UgvhM
Agenda 2: Masters of Deceit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ab_QoK0DFjw

Why do we need to protect the right to own a gun? BTW… I own zero guns…
This is a good documentary that shows examples of when our government has broken down…
And people needed weapons to defend their property and lives.
Rodney King Riots and Hurricane Katrina. See for yourself.
Assaulted: Civil Rights Under Fire (2013) Documentary Movie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYCEDPDYYIU

Chicago? Hire more police officers… Elementary kids know where to buy / borrow the guns, But the police can’t figure that out? WTF… Have the police crack down and arrest the sellers… What is the mayor doing? The Governor? You can’t have the federal government solve a state / city problem… Don’t you know how government works?

NRA as a Lobby?
1) NRA buying votes? Let’s look at the facts…
First, the NRA has contributed this much SINCE 1990.
Total $22,911,605
Dems got 17% $3,844,292
Individuals got $189,490
PACs got $20,199,499
Soft (Indivs) got $223,694
Soft (Orgs) got $2,235,322
Reps got 83% $18,978,465

Which averages 702,906 per year then divide that by let’s say half of our representatives…
535/2 that equals 262.76 per representative per year…
That wouldn’t even buy most of them lunch… so how can the NRA have so much pull in the government?
It’s not from lobbying and paying off representatives, it’s the members that vote that makes them powerful… And U.S. citizens protecting their 2nd amendment rights.

2) “gun show loophole”

Myth 1: The gun show loophole allows anyone to simply buy a gun at any gun show.

Myth 2: The gun show loophole doesn’t exist and is completely fabricated.

Fact: In most states, private sellers (unlike federally-licensed dealers) aren’t required to conduct background checks. The transaction doesn’t have to be at a gun show and therefore, what’s being labeled as a loophole isn’t specific to gun shows. Nevertheless it’s indeed possible to legally purchase guns without a background check in most states. A more precise label would be “private seller loophole.”

3) If firearm dealers are allowed to sell across state lines, the person buying the gun still has to have a background check.

4) Why the NRA was against the Dickey amendment? Quoted from their site…

“Expanding background checks at gun shows will not prevent the next shooting, will not solve violent crime and will not keep our kids safe in schools. While the overwhelming rejection of President Obama and Mayor Bloomberg’s “universal” background check agenda is a positive development, we have a broken mental health system that is not going to be fixed with more background checks at gun shows. The sad truth is that no background check would have prevented the tragedies in Newtown, Aurora or Tucson. We need a serious and meaningful solution that addresses crime in cities like Chicago, addresses mental health deficiencies, while at the same time protecting the rights of those of us who are not a danger to anyone. President Obama should be as committed to dealing with the gang problem that is tormenting honest people in his hometown as he is to blaming law-abiding gun owners for the acts of psychopathic murderers.”

What did Obama do? Very little to push them to do something.

5) Why pass that bill? And it wasn’t 96%, it was zero percent, allowed to be used for gun studies. Well the CDC is for preventing diseases not to pay for gun studies. Guns are not a disease. Plus Kellermann is known for his research on the epidemiology of firearm-related injuries and deaths, which he interpreted not as random, unavoidable acts but as preventable public-health priorities. Kellermann’s work, which shows an increased risk of mortality associated with gun ownership, has been disputed by some researchers and by gun rights organizations and individuals, in particular by the National Rifle Association. More on this at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/02/12/why-the-centers-for-disease-control-should-not-receive-gun-research-funding

6) The Firearm Owners’ Protection Act of 1986 (FOPA) is a United States federal law that revised many provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968. As such, FOPA makes it illegal for the national government or any state in the country to keep any sort of database or registry that ties firearms directly to their owner. There is however a limited database… the government just hasn’t gotten around to input the all data… Out of Business Records. Data is manually collected from paper Out-of-Business records (or input from computer records) and entered into the trace system by ATF. These are registration records which include name and address, make, model, serial and caliber of the firearm(s), as well as data from the 4473 form – in digital or image format. In March, 2010, ATF reported receiving several hundred million records since 1968.

7) Why are they so passionate? What will be next after your 2nd amendment? the 1st amendment, our 4th amendment? Where will it stop? We are moving slowly towards a communist state if that happens… Plus look at the past history when the population was disarmed… Those who do not remember the past, are bound to repeat it…

8) They want mental heath checks added… A few of the mass killings would not have detected mental heath issues… It is something that triggers them and they go and kill. They don’t care how they do it…

So let’s ban airplanes, rental trucks, cars, pressure cookers, etc…
They have been involved in mass killings too…

And as far as the mental health checks…
They can’t even get us affordable health care, how are they going to provide us with mental health checks?

Go ask your doctor…

I mean go ask your NEW doctor…

Remember what OUR government said?

“You can keep your doctor.”

Well… how can we trust them?

“Don’t worry… we’ll take your guns and protect you.”

Uh… rrrriiiiiggggghhhhhttttt…

Spread the love