Honey, I shrunk the Democrats Brains…

0
107 views
House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerrold Nadler of N.Y., makes an opening statement during a hearing with Corey Lewandowski, former campaign manager for President Donald Trump, Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2019, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

On why they are doing things incorrect in the impeachment…

I forgot… Democrats have a severe lack of English Comprehension and too lazy to do any research and have very little memory retention. They are like mental pit bulls until the get their next “squirrel” moment. Impeachment, interference, collusion, Russia, Charlottesville, Nazi, Daniels, mental capacity, tax returns, DACA, making NATO pay more, Comey getting fired, The Wall, immigration, government shutdown, stopping regime change wars, obstruction, collusion, quid pro quo, impeachment, Russia, impeachment, etc…
Anyway… here it is for you…
They were investigating… all Clinton’s pre-Presidental shenanigans. Triggered by the 1980’s Savings and Loan Crisis which, the people who were involved, led them to Whitewater and then that led them to Clinton. And then to Monica Lewinsky. That is why it was at first, a totally different scenario. They impeached him on Lewinsky, not any of the other stuff…

And BTW on a side note… guess who was the “Deputy Special Counsel of the Special Committee to Investigate Whitewater Development Corporation and Related Matters, which looks into allegations that President Bill Clinton and his wife, Hillary, took part in a fraudulent real estate deal.”?

Come on, you know… The media’s most trusted name in truth and a valuable source of information… Oops… Sorry, I mean… not a leaker… James Comey…

Comey couldn’t come up with another excuse, and like with Hillary’s server scandal found, BOTH times… “No Intent” When in both instances, Hillary obstructed the investigation, and destroyed evidence. And in the server investigation, in addition, mishandled classified documents.

“Initially chosen as Independent Counsel in 1994, and charged with investigating Bill and Hillary Clinton’s pre-presidency financial dealings with the Whitewater Land Company, Ken Starr, with the approval of Attorney General Janet Reno, conducted a wide-ranging investigation of alleged abuses including the firing of White House travel agents, the alleged misuse of FBI files, and Clinton’s conduct while he was a defendant in a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by a former Arkansas state government employee, Paula Jones. In the course of the investigation, Linda Tripp provided Starr with taped phone conversations in which Monica Lewinsky, a former White House Intern, discussed having oral sex with the president.”

Then, after the impeachment…

“The rules about to whom special prosecutors file their reports were changed afterward, in part because the Clinton White House said the Starr report was full of “irrelevant and unnecessary graphic and salacious allegations” designed to “damage the president.” Clinton’s attorney general Janet Reno put new regulations in place after Starr the report that required any subsequent special-counsel investigation to be delivered first to the attorney general, not Congress.”

According the the House Rules…

“Impeachment proceedings may be requested by a member of the House of Representatives on his or her own initiative, either by presenting a list of the charges under oath or by asking for referral to the appropriate committee. The impeachment process may be requested by non-members. For example, when the Judicial Conference of the United States suggests a federal judge be impeached, a charge of actions constituting grounds for impeachment may come from a special prosecutor, the President, or state or territorial legislature, grand jury, or by petition. An impeachment proceeding formally begins with a resolution adopted by the full House of Representatives, which typically includes a referral to a House committee.

The type of impeachment resolution determines the committee to which it is referred. A resolution impeaching a particular individual is typically referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. A resolution to authorize an investigation regarding impeachable conduct is referred to the House Committee on Rules, and then to the Judiciary Committee. The House Committee on the Judiciary, by majority vote, will determine whether grounds for impeachment exist (this vote is not law and is not required, US Constitution and US law). If the Committee finds grounds for impeachment, it will set forth specific allegations of misconduct in one or more articles of impeachment. The Impeachment Resolution, or Articles of Impeachment, are then reported to the full House with the committee’s recommendations.

The House debates the resolution and may at the conclusion consider the resolution as a whole or vote on each article of impeachment individually. A simple majority of those present and voting is required for each article for the resolution as a whole to pass. If the House votes to impeach, managers (typically referred to as “House managers”, with a “lead House manager”) are selected to present the case to the Senate. Recently, managers have been selected by resolution, while historically the House would occasionally elect the managers or pass a resolution allowing the appointment of managers at the discretion of the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives. These managers are roughly the equivalent of the prosecution or district attorney in a standard criminal trial.

Also, the House will adopt a resolution in order to notify the Senate of its action. After receiving the notice, the Senate will adopt an order notifying the House that it is ready to receive the managers. The House managers then appear before the bar of the Senate and exhibit the articles of impeachment. After the reading of the charges, the managers return and make a verbal report to the House.”

Normally…
A resolution impeaching a particular individual is typically referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Schiff is Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and a key witness so how can he be leading the investigation?

Plus he has lied 3 times and keeps leaking “out of context information” according to the ones who are actually in the room. But since there is a gag order by Schiff they can’t say what the actual context is.

In addition

“It is worth noting that in both 1974 and 1998 impeachment proceedings, the House judiciary committee voted to give the president procedural rights in the committee’s deliberations. The president and his counsel were invited to attend all executive session and open committee hearings, and the president’s counsel was entitled to cross-examine witnesses, make objections regarding the pertinence of evidence, respond to the evidence produced and even suggest additional evidence the committee should receive. Attorney James D. St. Clair represented Nixon before the House judiciary committee during the impeachment proceedings, essentially arguing that Nixon’s statements looked bad but were not criminal. Although St. Clair was not a government employee and was acting as Nixon’s private attorney, he insisted at the time that he was representing the office of the presidency rather than Nixon personally: ”I don’t represent Mr. Nixon personally …. I represent him in his capacity as president.” He made his final arguments before the House judiciary committee in July 1974 as it prepared articles of impeachment against Nixon. During the House judiciary committee’s proceedings to consider impeachment of Bill Clinton in 1998, Clinton’s private attorney David Kendall questioned Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr for an hour.”

So at least with the vote on the resolution, there is some semblance of trying to follow the rules, but they haven’t.

So anyway… Is there any there, there?

My spin on it is… You have the Democrats that aren’t in the loop and that have been brainwashed by the corporate media, pushing the Russia and Ukraine story, being clueless on what really happened over there and the Democrats that were involved (and I’m guessing a few “Never Trumper Republicans”), can’t tell them to drop it, otherwise the clueless ones will go… Hey… wait a minute…

It is fricking hilarious… It’s like watching someone keep poking a bee nest, just a matter of time before all the bees get pissed off and sting the shit out of them.

So let’s jump into this can of worms here…

First, stop watching CNN https://www.youtube.com/user/veritasvisuals
and all the other opinion, oops I mean “news” networks.

High Quality News? Uh…. Riiiiggghhhtttt… Unfortunately, until they are required to state that they are an opinion based news network vs an actual news network, people will have a hard time telling the difference…

I am just stunned that people actually believe “reporters” who supposedly have college degrees, have no comprehension of the English language. Where they comment on a document, letter or a statement and get the intent totally incorrect. And apparently they weren’t paying attention in college on how to investigate a story… Gather both sides of the story, do more research about story or the laws they are breaking and write about it with no bias one way or another and allow the facts to stand on their own. Without jumping the shark to get there first. And when they get it wrong… They rarely don’t even try to do any retraction or apology. Or it is buried in a back page section or a quick blip. In addition, it’s amazing how much I hear them misinterpreting the law… Go talk to a few lawyers and ask…. that is called “research”…

What happened to the days, where before they ran a story, they would fact check the story and then run it through their legal department so they wouldn’t get sued? And if it wasn’t able to be verified, they DIDN’T run it. Now they use anonymous sources that aren’t verified and second, third, even forth hand or more information. These days anyone can say anything without any repercussions. And there are people, gullible enough to believe it or too lazy to check and see if the information is correct.

CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and others wouldn’t know what a fact was, even if it slapped them upside the head. Opinion… pure opinion… backed up by little or no evidence…

Example… They took Mulvaney out of context and ran with it… He explained it long winded and everyone is so focused on Trump doing something wrong, they ignored it. At first, I thought he did too, until I watched again and paid attention to what Mulvaney actually said… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ns4QwN27P58 Mulvaney left out the NATO part all together (where the Dems were whining about Trump withholding NATO money in 2018) and Mulvaney should have asked… So are you Democrats saying, if you commit a crime (Biden’s quid pro quo) and run for President, you get a pass?

I guess so… Hillary did…

Pelosi said we are “Honoring the Constitution” and the media idiots, I mean media reporters, ran with it. Apparently neither of them have read the Constitution.

Article II of the Constitution, section 3, states:
“he shall take Care that the laws be faithfully executed”
Means, to all you future Einsteins out there… Trump is supposed to up hold the Constitution, Codes, and Laws of the United States and can either look into himself or ask anyone foreign or domestic to look in to elected officials breaking Constitution, Codes, and Laws of the United States.

Did you forget to “honor” that part of the Constitution?
Biden was an elected official at the time.

Pelosi said…”All roads lead to Putin” And the media ran with that statement.

All roads don’t lead to Putin… You took a wrong turn… It leads to Hillary, the DNC, Fusion GPS, Steele Dossier, The Ukraine, 7-8 billion dollars of U.S. aid that magically disappeared from the Ukraine and a whole lot more… But no, you all would rather ignore what is going on over there and everything that has happened here.

You Dems need to go to your doctor, Oops… I mean your new doctor and have them adjust your meds…

Stop listening to the Democrats, they lie to you…
Bloomberg:
The green new deal progressives really are coming for your beef.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-03-13/the-green-new-deal-progressives-really-are-coming-for-your-beef
Associated Press:
Steak, beer and politics 2020 Democrats descend on Iowa
https://www.wcjb.com/content/news/Steak-beer-and-politics-2020-Democrats-descend-on-Iowa-560946911.html

Dems… Do as I say, not as I do…

And look up Obama… pages and pages of broken campaign promises… The Obameter

And look at the top political liars… Your “team” holds the number one spot and 7 out of the top ten. Lying politicians… The worst liars in American-politics.

You need to do some research instead of listening to the media… It’s corporate brain washing… https://aretheythinking.com/reich-is-wrong/

There is more to the Ukraine story… Besides Biden’s quid pro quo… And yes Trump has the right to investigate information that Mueller ignored, and has the Constitution and a treaty that allows him to…

I know you Dems like ignoring the Constitution… but read it… Article 2 Section 3 of the Constitution and The Treaty Between the United States of America and Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters with Annex, signed at Kiev on July 22, 1998, and with an Exchange of Notes signed on September 30, 1999, which provides for its provisional application.

Biden boasted on video… he did quid pro quo… He was an elected official at the time. Now Biden’s story has changed to:

“The Obama administration, American allies, the International Monetary Fund and Ukrainian anti-corruption activists, among others, wanted the prosecutor fired”

Biden is using the same tactic the Clinton’s use, use many layers to cover your tracks. Four questions come to mind…

1) Somebody authorized the quid pro quo in our government, who was that?

2) Who is allowing foreign countries and organizations to dictate American policy?

3) Who are the “others”?

4) And why would the IMF be concerned about the Ukraine investigating a company, is there something they need to hide? Maybe we need to ask the banks Obama bailed out in 2008…. and I bet it will add to all the HSBC shenanigans. HSBC Money Laundering Scandal: U.S. Financial System Vulnerabilities (2012) and the Banksters documentary

Where is the media or even YOUR outrage for those four questions? Let’s look at the “Impeachment”. So yes there is reasons why Trump can ask the Ukraine for Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters. The Democrats are the ones who actually used a foreign government to interfere in the election, broke campaign finance laws, lied to the people under oath, and a lot more… Why did Mueller ignore all this?

April 21, 2019 – New Ukrainian President elected on anti-corruption agenda. With a new government change that models itself on “Trump’s drain the swamp”, they (the Dumbocrats) are scared what will actually come out of the Ukraine, since now they have no control over the country. And now the Ukrainian government can get to the bottom of what actually happened in Ukraine with Hillary and Biden. Also remember in 2018 the media complaining about Trump making the NATO countries pay more? Well Trump has been withholding money from countries trying to get all of them to pay more. Ukraine isn’t a full member but it is trying to become a member they are in the NATO’s Partnership for Peace program… With all the corruption in the country they have had a hard time securing a NATO membership action plan. With the new government in April they are hoping to become a member.

And Ukraine recently said they didn’t even know he was withholding money… So if they didn’t know he was withholding money then how can there be a quid pro quo? In addition, the call was made in July, the Ukraine wasn’t paid until September. Pretty fast pay off wouldn’t you say? Then the media tired to make a big deal out of Ukraine saying they weren’t expecting $391 million, when Ukraine was only expecting 250 million. In June, the Pentagon announced plans to provide $250 million to Ukraine in security cooperation funds for additional training, equipment and advisory efforts to build the capacity of Ukraine’s armed forces. The U.S. State Department separately planned to provide $141 million in aid.

And as far a Adam Schiff… Schiff broke…
Rule XXIII – Code Of Official Conduct
1. A Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, or employee of the House shall behave at all times in a manner that shall reflect creditably on the House.

Making up a story doesn’t reflect creditably on the House. (er… I mean parody… Uh right… he wanted a sound bite for the news to use.) Then Schiff lying to everyone saying, that he has proof Trump colluded with the Russians for 2 years, and he never brought forth any evidence… When in actuality it was Hillary who colluded with the Ukraine to dig up dirt on Trump and all she got was Manafort who was convicted of tax and bank fraud BEFORE Manafort even joined the Trump team. Manafort and his business associate Rick Gates were indicted in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on multiple charges arising from his consulting work for the pro-Russian government of Viktor Yanukovych in Ukraine before Yanukovych’s overthrow in 2014. Manafort joined Trump’s team in 2016… I’m sure he put down on his resume when he joined Trump’s team, BTW… I committed tax and bank fraud in 2014 in the Ukraine.

Want the Ukraine back story with documents? Check out Glenn Becks… Democrats Ukraine, Democracy does die in darkness and Democrats Hydra.
Watch them in that order…

And after watching those programs, my next questions are…

Where is the 7-8 billion dollars of US aid that magically disappeared?

And with Obama and Biden doing all this in the Ukraine, I find it hard to believe that the Republicans didn’t know or see anything, who in the Republican party let them get away with this or what did they get to keep silent?

Don’t you care?

Again… I am just stunned that you people actually believe all these “reporters” who supposedly have college degrees, have no comprehension of the English language. And apparently they weren’t paying attention in college on how to investigate a story… Gather both sides of the story, do any research about laws they are breaking and write about it with no bias one way or another and allow the facts to stand on their own. It’s amazing how much I hear them misinterpreting the law… Go talk to a few lawyers and ask…. that is called “research”…

Again… CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and others wouldn’t know what a fact was, even if it slapped them upside the head. Opinion… pure opinion… backed up by little or no evidence…

Spread the love